Since the global financial crisis it looks as though plans to stop global warming have stalled. The evidence is all around, stiff opposition to wind turbines and higher fuel bills. Political arguments over where to site new runways for London to accommodate ever more flights; a fully loaded jumbo jet takes off with 50,000 lbs of jet fuel, all to be burnt high in the atmosphere, it must add to greenhouse gas levels. It is not surprising that the political class has put the issue on a back burner, asking for sacrifices in the face of a nebulous and far off threat does not make for popularity. Also our economy is small compared some rapidly growing economies<\/p>\n
(The BRICs) which will produce vast amounts of additional green house gas; so what would be the point of burdening ourselves? Nevertheless the potential difficulties may become all too real for the generation that are at school in Truro today. We owe it to them to take the matter seriously.<\/p>\n
Part of the problem for decision makers is the scientific uncertainty that surrounds the issue. There will be a sneaky quality to climate change. If and when it comes it may not follow any of the current predictive models. It will catch out governments and individuals. It could be brutal. The IPCC s Fourth Assessment Report has central predictions of temperature rises between 2C and 4C and up to a 17% chance of rises above 4.5C.<\/p>\n
One study shows an uncomfortable 10% chance of rises of 6.8C or more. The IPCC projected forward, past data on rising sea level; eight inches in 100 years, this points to rises of less than a meter over the next 100 years.<\/p>\n
This may not be the whole story; the IPCC are reluctant to speculate in areas where they have not gathered hard data. Global emissions over the next few decades are also an unknown. Also climate systems are by nature non-linear, there will be feedback loops. James Lovelock, a renowned climate scientist who lives near Launceston wrote several books about these feedback loops. Perhaps the two most powerful would be absorption of additional heat from the sun as the ice covering is melted off dark coloured rocks and sea; another would be the release of frozen methane, a powerful greenhouse gas, from under the sea and the frozen tundra of Northern Russia and Canada, as temperatures rose. Other scientists includi ng Martin Rees, President of the Royal Society have endorsed this approach.<\/p>\n
It is not possible to carry out scientific experiments to solve this problem, so there can be no certainty. A possible guide is to look at what happened to Earth during a previous warming. Temperature was a degree or two warmer 125,000 years ago due to changed orbital dynamics of the Earth around the Sun. Sea levels then were four to six meters (20 feet) higher. A temperature rise of say four degrees or six degrees may make matters much worse.<\/p>\n
The scientific community are now very sure that global \u00a0temperatures are rising; all 11 years of this century have been amongst the hottest on record. Greenhouse gases, once in the atmosphere, can take tens of years to dissipate, in addition mankind is adding to them at an uncontrolled rate as the world population grows and other countries come to enjoy the higher standard of living that we have in the West; it may take decades to turn this around. There are some that now advocate preparations to mitigate what is to come as it may already be too late to stop the changes in time.<\/p>\n
Cornwall is lucky. Most of the land is well above sea level and the \u00a0climate is quite mild. This summer we might have had a taste of the future, we have had unsettled weather, long dry periods followed by weeks of heavy rain. Pictures on our TVs of the rapid melting of glaciers in Greenland and the sea ice of the Artic are very unsettling. Local temperatures in Cornwall may rise or fall, depending on what happens to the Gulf Stream. Melting ice from Greenland could switch off this circulation of ocean currents. Lizard Point is, after all, on the same line of latitude as St Johns in Newfoundland, which has very severe winters. So far the scientific evidence is inconclusive. The robust folk of Cornwall will no doubt cope with all these vicissitudes, except one. Rising sea levels.<\/p>\n
Recently \u00a3 3million has been spent on improving Truro docks and raising the flood barrier on the dockside, it is now 1.2meters high. If it is overtopped it will be when a maximum high tide coincides with low atmospheric pressure and a stormy onshore wind. Then there may be a gap of days, weeks, months, even years; then these circumstances will be repeated and it will happen again. Over time, with rising sea levels, floods will become more frequent causing greater damage in the city each time. Imagine standing at High Cross and the sea has reached the lip of the door and is pouring into the Cathedral, look around and assess the cost of the damage that will have occurred to all the buildings and livelihoods in the centre of Truro. That is what a sea level rise of 6m will look like. We may need to prevent this happening.<\/p>\n
At the same time traffic levels on the main roads into Truro at peak times, despite the park and ride, are becoming unbearable. Further house building all over the city will only make it worse. So a new road to take\u00a0some of the pressure off the A390 through Highertown and Tregolls Road would also be welcome. This is a proposal to combine the two projects by building a barrier across the river near Boscawen Park and to run a new bypass road over the top of the barrier.<\/p>\n
![\"\"](\"http:\/\/trurocivicsociety.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2012\/11\/Millau.jpg\" "\\"KONICA")
<\/a>Man made artefacts do not have to be ugly; they can often enhance the environment. My favourite is the Millau Viaduct over the River Tarn in France, but Truro cathedral and the railway viaducts across the city also improve the view. A solid barrier across the river could have a pleasing shape. It could be faced with Cornish granite and topped with a handsome balustrade such as those on the Thames embankment. If river traffic into the Truro basin was to continue there would have to be a gap with a rising or swing bridge, common in East Anglia and Holland. In the gap there could be a lock gate. This could be fully raised at times of threat and could be used to adjust water levels in the harbour to suit changing circumstances in the future.<\/p>\n